Skip to main content

People v. McLaughlin

Citations

  • 80 N.Y.2d 466
  • 606 N.E.2d 1357
  • 591 N.Y.S.2d 966
  • 1992 N.Y. LEXIS 4222

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that territorial jurisdiction must be proved by the State to the trier of fact beyond a reasonable doubt and citing to twenty-two jurisdictions that hold likewise
  • stating that venue refers to the proper county or place of trial and that the territorial jurisdiction which “goes to the very essence of the [s]tate’s power to prosecute”
  • stating that territorial jurisdiction “is a question of the sovereign’s power to prosecute and punish an accused for conduct which is allegedly criminal,” “goes to the very essence of the State’s power to prosecute,” and therefore “may never be waived”
  • “[F]or the State to have criminal jurisdiction, either the alleged conduct or some consequence of it must have occurred within the State.”
  • “If State territorial jurisdiction is put in issue during ... trial, the trial court should charge the jury that jurisdiction must be proven beyond a reasonable doubt.”
  • basis of New York’s jurisdiction in criminal cases is territorial principle derived from common law; general rule is that state has jurisdiction if either alleged conduct or some consequence of it occurred within state

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Hancock

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

63 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.