Court of Appeals of Oregon· 6/9/1982
State v. Burdick
Citations
- 646 P.2d 91
- 57 Or. App. 601
- 1982 Ore. App. LEXIS 3046
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- noting that, although police “trickery or false statements” alone may not be sufficiently coercive to result in involuntariness, the deceitful conduct was a factor in exclud- ing a suspect’s statements that were not shown to be volun- tary
- noting that, although police “trickery or false statements” alone may not be sufficiently coercive to result in involuntariness, the deceitful conduct was a factor in exclud- ing a suspect’s statements that were not shown to be volun- tary
- “[P]olice trickery or false statements, alone, may not be sufficiently coercive to result in involuntariness.”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Buttler, Warren
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
14 cases in this archive cite this case.
- State v. CochranCourt of Appeals of Oregon· 1985-03-06· cited 16×
- State v. LerchCourt of Appeals of Oregon· 1983-09-27· cited 14×
- State v. Vasquez-SantiagoCourt of Appeals of Oregon· 2019-12-04· cited 9×
- State v. CoxCourt of Appeals of Oregon· 1987-09-16· cited 7×
- State v. HarmonCourt of Appeals of Oregon· 1986-02-12· cited 6×
- State v. EarlsCourt of Appeals of Oregon· 1984-07-11· cited 5×
- State v. TobiasCourt of Appeals of Oregon· 1994-12-14· cited 5×
- State v. FosterCourt of Appeals of Oregon· 1986-12-10· cited 4×
- State v. WhiteCourt of Appeals of Oregon· 1982-09-08· cited 4×
- State v. EidsonCourt of Appeals of Oregon· 1985-05-22· cited 3×
- State v. FarmerCourt of Appeals of Oregon· 1983-11-09· cited 1×
- State v. DimeoCourt of Appeals of Oregon· 1987-03-25· cited 1×
- State v. MagpiongCourt of Appeals of Oregon· 2025-09-24· cited 1×
- State v. ParkerCourt of Appeals of Oregon· 1984-04-11
Cites
15 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- Miranda v. ArizonaSupreme Court· 1966-06-13· cited 58,288×
- Wong Sun v. United StatesSupreme Court· 1963-01-14· cited 12,871×
- Schneckloth v. BustamonteSupreme Court· 1973-05-29· cited 11,783×
- Culombe v. ConnecticutSupreme Court· 1961-06-19· cited 1,662×
- Frazier v. CuppSupreme Court· 1969-04-23· cited 1,468×
- Ball v. GladdenOregon Supreme Court· 1968-07-17· cited 849×
- State v. WarnerOregon Supreme Court· 1978-10-24· cited 244×
- State v. KennedyOregon Supreme Court· 1981-02-18· cited 196×
- State v. QuinnOregon Supreme Court· 1981-01-20· cited 183×
- State v. PazCourt of Appeals of Oregon· 1977-12-05· cited 82×
- State v. ScharfOregon Supreme Court· 1980-01-22· cited 54×
- State v. NettlesOregon Supreme Court· 1979-07-24· cited 38×
- State v. HackerCourt of Appeals of Oregon· 1981-04-20· cited 18×
- State v. LloydCourt of Appeals of Oregon· 1975-08-11· cited 15×
- State v. OakesCourt of Appeals of Oregon· 1974-10-28· cited 5×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.