Skip to main content

State v. Hacker

Citations

  • 627 P.2d 11
  • 51 Or. App. 743
  • 1981 Ore. App. LEXIS 2441

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • “Because we cannot determine * * * upon what theory each * * * piece of evidence was excluded, we remand for further proceedings.”
  • where alternative bases for granting or denying a motion to suppress exist and turn on factfinding by the trial court, case should be remanded

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Richardson, Thornton, Buttler

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

13 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

19 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.