Skip to main content
· 4/4/2001

United States v. David A. Ruzzano

Citations

  • 247 F.3d 688
  • 87 A.F.T.R.2d (RIA) 1561
  • 2001 U.S. App. LEXIS 5993
  • 2001 WL 355727

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • recognizing that “extraordinary circumstances” might excuse failure to seek refusal in timely manner
  • noting that “the fact that a judge was an [Assistant United States Attorney] during the prosecution, standing alone, does not require recusal”
  • mere possibility of different sentence “falls short of the required showing of a reasonable probability that the sentence would have been different”
  • mere possibility of different sentence “falls short of the required showing of a reasonable probability that the sentence would have been different”
  • a defendant must still show a reasonable probability that he received additional prison time because of counsel’s error
  • actual participation required to trigger disqualification

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Easterbrook, Kanne, Evans

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.