Skip to main content

State v. Buckingham

Citations

  • 772 N.W.2d 64
  • 2009 Minn. LEXIS 597
  • 2009 WL 2878133

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that “Buckingham’s failure to raise any factual disputes regarding the substance of the unrecorded statement at the omnibus hearing is fatal to his claimed Scales violation” and “no improper contact occurred” between the police and Buckingham
  • finding no reversible error due to testimonial references to a gang where the district court instructed the jury that the defendant was not on trial for his gang-member status or for associating with gang members
  • “Buckingham eventually expressed his willingness to speak without his attorney present.”
  • “We need not determine if there was a Scales violation here because, if there was, it was not substantial.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Anderson

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

8 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

21 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.