Skip to main content
· 7/10/2008

State v. Gauster

Citations

  • 752 N.W.2d 496
  • 2008 Minn. LEXIS 322
  • 2008 WL 2678037

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • explaining that because the act of impoundment “‘gives rise to the 8 need for and justification of the inventory [search],’ the threshold inquiry when determining the reasonableness of an inventory search is whether the impoundment of the vehicle was proper” (citation omitted)

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Anderson, Paul, Magnuson, Dietzen

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.