Thomas E. Blunt v. United States of America, Thomas E. Blunt v. United States

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• warning that adding to the record “flakes] on the aspect of advocacy”
• warning that adding to the record “t[akes] on the aspect of advocacy”
• reversing where the judge examined the defendant’s expert with “insistent questioning” designed to persuade the jury that the expert’s “testimony was entitled to little weight because not based on fact”
• judge stated matter in issue as a fact, and in other respects advocated the prosecution’s position
• stipulation of parties that new judgment be entered so as to allow proper appeal
• stipulation of parties that new judgment be entered so as to allow proper appeal

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).