Salley v. State

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• concluding the probationer did not knowingly and intelligently waive her right to counsel because she was not informed of the dangers of self- representation and she did not want to proceed without counsel
• stating an individual may waive his or her right to counsel; however, the trial court \has the duty to ensure that [an individual] makes an intelligent and competent waiver of counsel\
• stating an appellate court \will look to the record to discern whether there are facts to show the defendant had sufficient background or was apprised of his rights by some other source so as to constitute a knowing and intelligent waiver of the right to counsel\
• “The right to counsel attaches in probation revocation hearings.”
• \The right to counsel attaches in probation revocation hearings.\

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

4 cases in this archive cite this case.

• State v. Bryant
  Court of Appeals of South Carolina· 2009-05-05· cited 24×
• Duckson v. State
  Supreme Court of South Carolina· 2003-09-08· cited 8×
• City of Columbia v. Brown
  Court of Appeals of South Carolina· 1994-10-10· cited 4×
• Stevenson v. State
  Supreme Court of South Carolina· 1999-11-01· cited 3×

Cites

7 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• Faretta v. California
  Supreme Court· 1975-06-30· cited 11,585×
• Prince v. State
  Supreme Court of South Carolina· 1990-05-29· cited 39×
• Wroten v. State
  Supreme Court of South Carolina· 1990-04-30· cited 30×
• High v. State
  Supreme Court of South Carolina· 1989-12-04· cited 22×
• Barlet v. State
  Supreme Court of South Carolina· 1986-05-05· cited 21×
• Huckaby v. State
  Supreme Court of South Carolina· 1991-08-05· cited 8×
• State v. Bateman
  Supreme Court of South Carolina· 1988-10-31· cited 8×