Skip to main content

State v. Brown

Citations

  • 2023 Ohio 258

Syllabus

The trial court did not err in denying appellant's motion for a new trial and his third petition for postconviction relief where the appellant failed to demonstrate that the state committed a Brady violation by not providing appellant with medical reports of the victim, and where appellant failed to demonstrate that he was unavoidably prevented from discovering the information contained in the medical reports within the time for filing his motion or petition. Further, the trial court did not err in finding that appellant's claims were barred by res judicata as appellant was aware of the information contained in the medical reports at the time of trial and could have raised the issues at either the time of trial, in his direct appeal, or in one of his other appearances before this court.

Judges: S. Powell

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

1 case in this archive cites this case.

Cites

19 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.