Skip to main content

State v. Brown

Citations

  • 2017 Ohio 4231

Syllabus

The trial court did not abuse its discretion in denying appellant's motion for a new trial where the evidence allegedly leading to surprise was introduced at trial and was cumulative to other evidence of appellant's sexual abuse of the victim. Nor did appellant receive ineffective assistance of counsel because the result of his trial would not have been different where his counsel challenged the credibility of the victim during cross-examination.

Judges: Piper

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

2 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

6 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.