State v. Brown
Citations
- 2017 Ohio 4231
Syllabus
The trial court did not abuse its discretion in denying appellant's motion for a new trial where the evidence allegedly leading to surprise was introduced at trial and was cumulative to other evidence of appellant's sexual abuse of the victim. Nor did appellant receive ineffective assistance of counsel because the result of his trial would not have been different where his counsel challenged the credibility of the victim during cross-examination.
Judges: Piper
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
2 cases in this archive cite this case.
Cites
6 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- Strickland v. WashingtonSupreme Court· 1984-06-25· cited 123,578×
- Brady v. MarylandSupreme Court· 1963-05-13· cited 33,902×
- State v. AdamsOhio Supreme Court· 1980-05-07· cited 3,804×
- State v. WicklineOhio Supreme Court· 1990-04-11· cited 301×
- State v. HannaOhio Supreme Court· 2002-05-22· cited 176×
- State v. ClarkeOhio Court of Appeals· 2016-10-03· cited 49×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.