Skip to main content

State v. Brown

Citations

  • 413 P.3d 783
  • 307 Kan. 641

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • explaining the need to prevent use of inadmissible evidence and give the trial court the \opportunity to address the issue\
  • characterizing contemporaneous objection rule to be clear and regularly stated in caselaw
  • An appellate court exercises de novo review of a challenge to the adequacy of the legal basis of a district judge's decision on admission or exclusion of evidence.
  • contemporaneous objection is required to preserve evidentiary issue for appeal

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Nuss

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

7 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

11 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.