Voelkel v. State

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that exhibits never offered or admitted into evidence constitute no error where there was testimony and discussion without objection regarding the exhibits
• cigarette case was never offered or admitted into evidence, but it was referred to and discussed by parties on several instances
• cigarette case was never offered or admitted into evidence, but it was referred to and discussed by parties on several instances
• when amphetamine was treated as admitted into evidence, although it was never offered or admitted, amphetamine could be considered by trial court
• when amphetamine was treated as admitted into evidence, although it was never offered or admitted, amphetamine could be considered by trial court

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

10 cases in this archive cite this case.

• Morrison v. State
  Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas· 1992-12-16· cited 119×
• Taylor v. State
  Tex. App. Ct., 1st Dist. (Houston)· 1997-04-24· cited 83×
• Rexford v. State
  Tex. App. Ct., 1st Dist. (Houston)· 1991-10-03· cited 47×
• Voelkel v. State
  Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas· 1986-05-14· cited 31×
• State v. Brown
  Supreme Court of Kansas· 2018-03-23· cited 28×
• Newhouse v. State
  Tex. App. Ct., 1st Dist. (Houston)· 2001-08-02· cited 6×
• Robert Dodd v. State
  Tex. App. Ct., 6th Dist. (Texarkana)· 2004-01-08
• John Wesley Walsh v. State
  Tex. App. Ct., 6th Dist. (Texarkana)· 2009-02-19
• Robert Hernandez v. State
  Tex. App. Ct., 11th Dist. (Eastland)· 2006-07-13
• Andrea Robles v. State
  Tex. App. Ct., 2nd Dist. (Fort Worth)· 2013-09-12