Skip to main content
· 3/16/2001

United States v. McCoy, Joann

Citations

  • 242 F.3d 399
  • 345 U.S. App. D.C. 211
  • 2001 U.S. App. LEXIS 3969
  • 2001 WL 256268

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that where the court clerk's exhibit list shows exhibits admitted and all parties understand them to be admitted, there is no error
  • remanding case for district court to determine applicability of sentencing enhancement because \on the record before us we cannot conclude with confidence that it employed the correct legal standard in applying the ... enhancement\
  • \McCoy argues ... that her testimony was not the same in both proceedings ....\ (emphasis added)

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Garland, Henderson, Randolph

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.