State v. LaGrange

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• comparing elements of Colorado assault conviction to elements of K.S.A. 21-3412
• appellate court had jurisdiction to consider'appeal from possible illegal sentence where defendant argued trial court operated under mistaken belief it had no discretion not to impose consecutive sentences
• when a defendant is sentenced for separate crimes on the same date, the court has discretion to run the sentences concurrently or consecutively under K.S.A. 21-4608[1]

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

7 cases in this archive cite this case.

• State v. Barajas
  Court of Appeals of Kansas· 2010-04-22· cited 36×
• State v. Dunham
  Court of Appeals of Kansas· 2020-07-31· cited 25×
• State v. Christensen
  Court of Appeals of Kansas· 1997-05-02· cited 11×
• State v. Tolliver
  Court of Appeals of Kansas· 1996-05-17· cited 10×
• State v. Vaughn
  Court of Appeals of Kansas· 2020-08-14· cited 4×
• State v. Carrasco
  Court of Appeals of Kansas· 2001-03-02· cited 2×
• State v. Rodriguez
  Supreme Court of Kansas· 2017-03-24

Cites

9 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• State v. Ruff
  Supreme Court of Kansas· 1993-03-05· cited 96×
• State v. Flinchpaugh
  Supreme Court of Kansas· 1983-02-19· cited 78×
• State v. Graham
  Supreme Court of Kansas· 1990-10-26· cited 76×
• Hughes v. Inland Container Corp.
  Supreme Court of Kansas· 1990-10-26· cited 58×
• State v. Anthony
  Supreme Court of Kansas· 1988-01-15· cited 40×
• State v. Brown
  Supreme Court of Kansas· 1989-12-08· cited 34×
• State v. Fifer
  Court of Appeals of Kansas· 1994-09-30· cited 14×
• State v. Peal
  Court of Appeals of Kansas· 1995-04-07· cited 7×
• State v. Owens
  Court of Appeals of Kansas· 1994-06-17· cited 6×