State v. Brown

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• “[W]e first consider whether the officers complied with the [inventory] policy; if they did so, we then consider whether the policy was constitutionally permissible ***.”
• officer’s removal of items in arrestee’s pockets was authorized by inventory policy directing police to “remove all items of personal property from the clothing worn by [the arrestee]”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

6 cases in this archive cite this case.

• State v. Jones
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 2011-08-31· cited 13×
• State v. Cordova
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 2012-06-13· cited 5×
• State v. Worthington
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 2014-09-10· cited 3×
• State v. Hockersmith
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 2014-08-06
• State v. Towai
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 2017-04-19
• State v. Hewitt
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 2019-11-27

Cites

11 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• State v. Wyatt
  Oregon Supreme Court· 2000-12-01· cited 659×
• State v. Atkinson
  Oregon Supreme Court· 1984-09-25· cited 164×
• State v. Perry
  Oregon Supreme Court· 1984-09-25· cited 63×
• State v. Miller
  Oregon Supreme Court· 2008-08-14· cited 41×
• State v. Martin
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 2008-09-03· cited 27×
• State v. Willhite
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 1992-01-15· cited 21×
• State v. Marsh
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 1986-03-26· cited 18×
• State v. Guerrero
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 2007-07-11· cited 17×
• State v. Nelson
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 2002-05-29· cited 7×
• State v. Tyler
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 2000-06-28· cited 7×
• State v. Bostwick
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 2009-02-18· cited 3×