State v. Guerrero

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• stating that the inventory policy of the Marion County Jail “arguably was sufficient to authorize the officers to open closed containers that are designed to contain money or jewelry”
• “The purpose of an inventory is to deal with property that properly comes into police custody in a noninvestigatory context.”
• applying the Atkinson standard to inventory of personal belongings

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

16 cases in this archive cite this case.

• State v. Lovaina-Burmudez
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 2013-06-05· cited 21×
• State v. Williams
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 2009-04-15· cited 11×
• State v. Keady
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 2010-08-11· cited 7×
• State v. Brown
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 2009-07-01· cited 6×
• State v. Cleland
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 2017-12-20· cited 6×
• State v. Taylor
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 2012-05-16· cited 6×
• State v. Cherry
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 2014-05-07· cited 6×
• State v. Hartman
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 2010-11-17· cited 5×
• State v. Steele
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 2018-03-07· cited 5×
• State v. Cordova
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 2012-06-13· cited 5×
• State v. Snow
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 2011-12-29· cited 4×
• State v. Stone
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 2009-12-09· cited 4×
• State v. Cruz-Renteria
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 2012-06-27· cited 4×
• State v. Davis
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 2014-04-30· cited 2×
• State v. Joseph
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 2010-10-20
• State v. Towai
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 2017-04-19