Supreme Court of Minnesota· 8/17/1984
State v. Langley
Citations
- 354 N.W.2d 389
- 1984 Minn. LEXIS 1431
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- refusing to reverse a murder conviction in light of the defendant’s failure to object, and strong, but circumstantial, evidence of guilt
- limiting category of murder cases to which victim’s state of mind is relevant to those involving claims of suicide, accident or self-defense
- stating sufficiency of the evidence standard for cases proven by circumstantial evidence
- the weight of the circumstantial evidence negated the possibility of accidental death
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Amdahl
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
35 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- State v. MyersSupreme Court of Minnesota· 1984-12-21· cited 253×
- State v. ShurnSupreme Court of Missouri· 1993-12-21· cited 205×
- State v. BiasSupreme Court of Minnesota· 1988-02-12· cited 110×
- State v. BauerSupreme Court of Minnesota· 1999-07-29· cited 92×
- State v. FloresSupreme Court of Minnesota· 1988-01-15· cited 92×
- State v. CraftsSupreme Court of Connecticut· 1993-07-06· cited 86×
- Rairdon v. StateSupreme Court of Minnesota· 1996-12-12· cited 76×
- State v. RaceSupreme Court of Minnesota· 1986-03-21· cited 67×
- State v. DeWaldSupreme Court of Minnesota· 1990-11-30· cited 56×
- State v. OrtleppSupreme Court of Minnesota· 1985-02-15· cited 51×
- State v. BlasusSupreme Court of Minnesota· 1989-09-15· cited 49×
- State v. RhodesSupreme Court of Minnesota· 2001-06-07· cited 42×
- State v. SteinbuchSupreme Court of Minnesota· 1994-04-08· cited 38×
- State v. HallmarkSupreme Court of Minnesota· 2019-05-15· cited 36×
- State v. Moua HerSupreme Court of Minnesota· 2008-05-29· cited 26×
- State v. IvesSupreme Court of Minnesota· 1997-09-11· cited 25×
- Mnd v. BmdCourt of Appeals of Minnesota· 1984-10-30· cited 20×
- State v. Dao XiongSupreme Court of Minnesota· 2013-04-24· cited 14×
- State v. WaukazoCourt of Appeals of Minnesota· 1985-10-01· cited 11×
- State v. LeeSupreme Court of Minnesota· 2002-06-20· cited 10×
Cites
27 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- Pointer v. TexasSupreme Court· 1965-04-05· cited 4,761×
- People v. IrelandCalifornia Supreme Court· 1969-02-28· cited 431×
- State v. SpreiglSupreme Court of Minnesota· 1965-12-17· cited 368×
- State v. MerrillSupreme Court of Minnesota· 1978-12-01· cited 321×
- United States v. Donald Laverne Carlson, United States of America v. Gary Clarend HofstadEighth Circuit· 1977-01-18· cited 296×
- State v. SaldanaSupreme Court of Minnesota· 1982-08-31· cited 204×
- State v. WahlbergSupreme Court of Minnesota· 1980-08-08· cited 202×
- National Motor Freight Traffic Ass'n v. United StatesSupreme Court· 1977-05-16· cited 170×
- State v. BillstromSupreme Court of Minnesota· 1967-03-10· cited 160×
- State v. UlvinenSupreme Court of Minnesota· 1981-12-17· cited 133×
- People v. ArcegaCalifornia Supreme Court· 1982-09-30· cited 102×
- State v. BoyceSupreme Court of Minnesota· 1969-08-01· cited 81×
- State v. HansenSupreme Court of Minnesota· 1981-11-06· cited 79×
- Michael Lenza v. Donald W. Wyrick, Warden Attorney General of the State of MissouriEighth Circuit· 1981-12-02· cited 67×
- People v. LewCalifornia Supreme Court· 1968-06-25· cited 66×
- Krueger v. KnutsonSupreme Court of Minnesota· 1961-10-06· cited 56×
- State v. BlanchardSupreme Court of Minnesota· 1982-02-05· cited 54×
- State v. BrownSupreme Court of Minnesota· 1984-05-18· cited 48×
- State v. OlsonSupreme Court of Minnesota· 1980-03-14· cited 34×
- United States v. Wiley Rufus WardFifth Circuit· 1977-05-13· cited 32×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.