Skip to main content

State v. Brown

Citations

  • 397 N.W.2d 689
  • 1986 Iowa Sup. LEXIS 1356

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that where pathologist “testified extensively with respect to the nature, extent, and severity of [victim’s] wounds,” the “autopsy photographs were relevant to illustrate and explain [pathologist’s] testimony”
  • noting that the “stronger the State’s evidence of [the defendant’s] guilt is, the less prejudicial the effect of the challenged testimony”
  • holding admonition to disregard improper material is generally sufficient to prevent prejudice
  • accused challenging denial of motion to sever defendants must show that jury could not compartmentalize evidence
  • rejected defendant’s contention that the length and complexity of the trial prejudiced his right to a fair trial
  • “The existence of corroborative evidence is a question of law; the sufficiency of that evidence ordinarily is a question of fact.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Reynoldson

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

52 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

37 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.