Court of Appeals of Iowa· 10/25/1994

State v. Delaney

Citations

526 N.W.2d 170
1994 Iowa App. LEXIS 130
1994 WL 725621

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

noting the district court’s ruling on the motion in limine was equivocal, and therefore no violation occurred when the State introduced evidence
finding no abuse of discretion although “eight loan transactions covered an 8 eleven month period”
vacating sentence where the sentencing court’s reasons related solely to the denial of probation and stating that “more is required to enable us to properly perform our review”
\A motion in limine does not preserve error since the error does not occur until the matter is presented at trial. An objection should be made at trial to preserve error.\
“[W]e look to all parts of the record to find the supporting reasons.”
“There was no indication . . . that the reasons for imposing consecutive sentences were tied to the rather generic and brief reasons for denying probation, or were covered by an overall plan of sentencing.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Sackett, Habhab, Cady

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

41 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

30 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.