Hawaii Supreme Court· 6/19/1989

State v. Brown

Citations

776 P.2d 1182
70 Haw. 459
1989 Haw. LEXIS 33

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

due process was offended where the judge who tried the defendant's 19/ This is not surprising, as one of the purposes of HRCJC Rule 2.11(a
due process was offended where the judge who tried the defendant's 19/ This is not surprising, as one of the purposes of HRCJC Rule 2.11(a
“ ‘[a] fair trial in a fair tribunal is a basic requirement of due process.’ ”
due process requires that a defendant charged by a judge with an indirect constructive criminal contempt for failing to appear before the court be tried for that charge before a different judge
a defendant’s failure to appear at a scheduled court hearing

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Lum, Nakamura, Padgett, Hayashi, Wakatsuki

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

29 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

12 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.