Skip to main content

State v. Ryan

Citations

  • 583 P.2d 329
  • 59 Haw. 425
  • 1978 Haw. LEXIS 205

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • “[t]he mere fact of appellant’s absence... was not sufficient to enable [the court] to infer the intent with which appellant absented himself.”
  • If the offense was not committed in the immediate view of the court nor committed under such circumstances that the court had knowledge of all the facts constituting the offense, the conviction must be regarded as under HRS § 710-1077(3)(b)

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Richardson, C.J., and Kobayashi, Ogata, Menor and Kidwell

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

8 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

11 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.