State v. Hicks

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that HRS § 710-1077(5) requires the trial court set out written findings of the particular circumstances of contempt

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

6 cases in this archive cite this case.

• In the Interest of Doe
  Hawaii Intermediate Court of Appeals· 2001-07-20· cited 4×
• Houston v. Eighth Judicial District Court of the State of Nevada ex rel. County of Clark
  Nevada Supreme Court· 2006-06-15· cited 4×
• In the Interest of Doe
  Hawaii Intermediate Court of Appeals· 1999-12-22· cited 3×
• Houston v. DIST. CT.
  Nevada Supreme Court· 2006-06-15
• State v. Kalipi
  Hawaii Supreme Court· 1996-03-18
• State v. Griffin
  Hawaii Supreme Court· 1996-09-10

Cites

3 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• State v. Brown
  Hawaii Supreme Court· 1989-06-19· cited 34×
• State v. Schutter
  Hawaii Supreme Court· 1979-01-05· cited 12×
• State v. Masaniai
  Hawaii Intermediate Court of Appeals· 1990-03-16· cited 1×