Skip to main content

State v. Price

Citations

  • 620 P.2d 994
  • 94 Wash. 2d 810
  • 1980 Wash. LEXIS 1421

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • stating that forcing defendant to choose between effective assistance of counsel and speedy trial impermissibly prejudices defendant
  • stating that forcing defendant to choose between effective assistance of counsel and speedy trial impermissibly prejudices defendant
  • discussing the policy of appropriate allocation in regard to forged steelhead tags
  • Defendant must prove that interjection of new facts into the case “when the State has not acted with due diligence” will compel him to choose between prejudicing either of these rights.
  • injecting new facts forces the choice between the rights
  • injecting new facts forces the choice between the rights

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Brachtenbach

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

39 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

7 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.