Skip to main content

State v. Tennant

Citations

  • 310 Or. App. 70
  • 483 P.3d 1226

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • “[T]he state does not contend—* * *, prop- erly so—that defendant was required to consent to a search by virtue of his probationary status.”
  • “To establish con- sent, the state first must establish that defendant’s ‘consent’ was, in fact, consent, and ‘not mere acquiescence to a thinly veiled demand.’ ”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: James

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

6 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

16 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.