United States v. Reyeros

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that Columbian courts holding extradition documents did not serve as an arm of the United States government and therefore Jencks Act did not apply to such documents
• holding that Columbian courts holding extradition documents did not serve as an arm of the United States government and therefore the Jencks Act did not apply to such documents
• asserting that question of whether court abused its discretion should be judged as of the time court ruled on motion to sever
• noting that a case-by-case analysis is appropriate when considering the prosecution’s constructive knowledge of exculpatory evidence under Brady
• noting that a relevant factor is whether the entity charged with constructive possession had “ready access” to the evidence
• considering, among other things, whether the entity charged with constructive possession has ready access to the evidence

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).