State v. Brannan

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that the parties consented to defendant’s use of facts outside the indictment to challenge same, notwithstanding the general prohibition against speaking demurrers in criminal cases
• trial court should have dismissed indictment where the underlying facts, as \stipulated in writing\ by the parties, did not constitute the alleged offense
• trial court should have dismissed indictment where the underlying facts, as “stipulated in writing” by the parties, did not constitute the alleged offense

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).