State v. Brannan

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that the parties consented to defendant’s use of facts outside the indictment to challenge same, notwithstanding the general prohibition against speaking demurrers in criminal cases
• trial court should have dismissed indictment where the underlying facts, as \stipulated in writing\ by the parties, did not constitute the alleged offense
• trial court should have dismissed indictment where the underlying facts, as “stipulated in writing” by the parties, did not constitute the alleged offense

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

11 cases in this archive cite this case.

• Love v. State
  Supreme Court of Georgia· 1999-06-01· cited 46×
• Cobb County School District v. Barker
  Supreme Court of Georgia· 1999-05-03· cited 43×
• Bohannon v. State
  Supreme Court of Georgia· 1998-02-23· cited 31×
• Santos v. State
  Supreme Court of Georgia· 2008-10-27· cited 25×
• Old South Duck Tours, Inc. v. Mayor of Savannah
  Supreme Court of Georgia· 2000-10-10· cited 18×
• State v. Williams
  Supreme Court of Georgia· 2019-06-03· cited 7×
• State v. Randall
  Supreme Court of Georgia· 2022-10-25· cited 6×
• State v. Johnson
  Supreme Court of Georgia· 1998-10-19· cited 5×
• Davis v. the State
  Court of Appeals of Georgia· 2017-03-10· cited 4×
• WILLIAMS, CONGRESSWOMAN v. POWELL
  Supreme Court of Georgia· 2024-10-31· cited 2×
• Ewell v. State
  Court of Appeals of Georgia· 2000-08-21· cited 1×

Cites

4 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• Florida Star v. B. J. F.
  Supreme Court· 1989-06-21· cited 500×
• Western & Atlantic Railroad v. Gray
  Supreme Court of Georgia· 1931-02-20· cited 27×
• Schuman v. State
  Supreme Court of Georgia· 1994-10-11· cited 10×
• Development Authority v. Beverly Enterprises
  Supreme Court of Georgia· 1981-01-30· cited 5×