Schuman v. State

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• motion to dismiss on facts not appearing on face of indictment is “speaking demurrer” that generally presents no authority for quashing indictment
• while there is no authority for dismissal of indictment on basis of facts not appearing on face of indictment, State was precluded from challenging proceeding to which it consented
• a demurrer that \add[s] facts not appearing on the face of the indictment\ is a \speaking demurrer\ that \presents no authority for quashing an indictment and is void\

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

8 cases in this archive cite this case.

• Santos v. State
  Supreme Court of Georgia· 2008-10-27· cited 25×
• State v. Brannan
  Supreme Court of Georgia· 1996-11-12· cited 16×
• State v. Henderson
  Court of Appeals of Georgia· 2006-12-19· cited 10×
• State v. Williams
  Supreme Court of Georgia· 2019-06-03· cited 7×
• Rader v. State
  Court of Appeals of Georgia· 2009-10-08· cited 6×
• Davis v. the State
  Court of Appeals of Georgia· 2017-03-10· cited 4×
• Ewell v. State
  Court of Appeals of Georgia· 2000-08-21· cited 1×
• State v. Schuman
  Court of Appeals of Georgia· 1995-04-20

Cites

3 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• Jackson v. State
  Court of Appeals of Georgia· 1993-03-19· cited 16×
• State v. Finkelstein
  Court of Appeals of Georgia· 1984-04-02· cited 6×
• State v. Schuman
  Court of Appeals of Georgia· 1994-02-14· cited 2×