Supreme Court of Georgia· 10/27/2008
Santos v. State
Citations
- 668 S.E.2d 676
- 284 Ga. 514
- 2008 Fulton County D. Rep. 3371
- 2008 Ga. LEXIS 849
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- registration statute is unconstitutionally vague as to homeless offenders because it does not provide sufficient notice of how they can comply with the registration requirement
- sex offender registration statute unconstitutionally vague as applied to homeless offender because statute requires a street or route address
- registration statute is unconstitutionally vague as to homeless offenders because it does not provide sufficient notice of how they can comply with the registration requirement
- sex offender registration statute unconstitutionally vague as applied to homeless offender because statute requires a street or route address
- decision rendering unconstitutional the address registration requirement as applied to homeless sex offenders with no street address does not exempt such offenders from reporting other information required under the statute
- statute contains “no objective standard or guidelines that would put homeless sexual offenders without a street or route address on notice of what conduct is required of them, thus leaving them to guess as to how to achieve compliance with the statute’s reporting provisions”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Thompson, Carley
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
18 cases in this archive cite this case.
- People v. DowdyMichigan Supreme Court· 2011-07-11· cited 48×
- State of Alabama v. Thornal Lee Adams.Court of Criminal Appeals of Alabama· 2010-11-05· cited 25×
- Malloy v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia· 2013-06-17· cited 22×
- State v. MeadorNorth Dakota Supreme Court· 2010-07-13· cited 19×
- State v. PhillipsCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland· 2013-03-20· cited 14×
- Pitts v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia· 2013-09-09· cited 11×
- Parker v. CITY OF GLENNVILLESupreme Court of Georgia· 2010-10-18· cited 10×
- Prophitt v. the StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia· 2016-03-22· cited 8×
- Raber v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia· 2009-03-23· cited 7×
- Watson v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia· 2013-10-21· cited 7×
- Dunn v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia· 2009-11-23· cited 6×
- Braley v. City of Forest ParkSupreme Court of Georgia· 2010-03-22· cited 6×
- David L. Meador v. Pat BransonEighth Circuit· 2012-08-16· cited 5×
- Vann v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Alabama· 2013-12-20· cited 5×
- Chestnut v. the StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia· 2015-03-13· cited 3×
- Volz v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia· 2010-11-10· cited 2×
- Youmans v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia· 2012-10-15· cited 1×
- State of Arizona v. Lynn Lavern BurbeyArizona Supreme Court· 2017-10-13
Cites
13 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- United States v. HarrissSupreme Court· 1954-06-07· cited 1,827×
- City of Chicago v. MoralesSupreme Court· 1999-06-10· cited 1,379×
- United States v. MazurieSupreme Court· 1975-01-21· cited 1,043×
- Patel v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia· 2007-09-24· cited 61×
- Hall v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia· 1997-05-12· cited 43×
- Thelen v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia· 2000-02-14· cited 33×
- Twine v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland· 2006-11-15· cited 29×
- Roemhild v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia· 1983-10-25· cited 21×
- People v. NorthCalifornia Court of Appeal· 2003-10-20· cited 19×
- State v. RubeyNorth Dakota Supreme Court· 2000-06-08· cited 17×
- State v. BrannanSupreme Court of Georgia· 1996-11-12· cited 16×
- Krieger v. Walton County Board of CommissionersSupreme Court of Georgia· 1998-07-16· cited 12×
- Schuman v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia· 1994-10-11· cited 10×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.