Skip to main content

State v. Bond

Citations

  • 2024 Ohio 3419

Syllabus

The trial court did not err in failing to advise appellant of his post-release control obligations at his third sentencing hearing, as appellant had previously been advised of those obligations during his initial sentencing hearing and in his original and amended judgment entries. The trial court's failure to advise appellant of his appellate rights at resentencing was harmless error because appellant filed a timely notice of appeal and demonstrated his understanding of his appellate rights. Appellant's other arguments are barred by res judicata because he failed to raise them in his direct appeal. Judgment affirmed.

Judges: Huffman

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cites

4 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.