Skip to main content

State v. Baldonado

Citations

  • 847 P.2d 751
  • 115 N.M. 106

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • stating that it is the defendant's burden to demonstrate that a seizure occurred that implicated his constitutional rights
  • stating that the use of emergency lights does not preclude a consensual encounter
  • when officer pulls in behind stopped car and activates flashing lights, whether there has been a seizure depends on all the circumstances
  • “[A] trial court could find, based on what is on an officer’s mind together with surrounding circumstances, that if the officer believes that the defendants are not free to leave it may be more likely that the defendants would feel that they are not free to leave.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Pickard, Alarid, Apodaca

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

17 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

26 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.