Ohio Court of Appeals· 7/24/2017

State v. Bolden

Citations

2017 Ohio 6931

Syllabus

The admission of defendant-appellant's taped telephone conversation made while in jail was not more prejudicial than probative. Judgment of the trial court is affirmed.

Judges: Zimmerman

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

1 case in this archive cites this case.

State v. Greene
Ohio Court of Appeals· 2022-04-25· cited 1×

Cites

10 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Blakemore v. Blakemore
Ohio Supreme Court· 1983-07-06· cited 14,330×
State v. Maurer
Ohio Supreme Court· 1984-12-20· cited 1,623×
State v. Issa
Ohio Supreme Court· 2001-08-29· cited 787×
State v. Conway
Ohio Supreme Court· 2006-06-21· cited 704×
United States v. John Ray Bonds (91-3610) Mark Verdi (91-3609) and Steven Wayne Yee (91-3608)
Sixth Circuit· 1994-02-18· cited 509×
State v. Lang
Ohio Supreme Court· 2011-08-31· cited 509×
State v. Williams
Ohio Supreme Court· 2012-12-06· cited 417×
State v. Morales
Ohio Supreme Court· 1987-09-02· cited 329×
State v. Skatzes
Ohio Supreme Court· 2004-12-08· cited 294×
Brammer v. Meachem
Ohio Court of Appeals· 2011-02-07· cited 25×

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.