Skip to main content

State v. Bolden

Citations

  • 371 S.W.3d 802
  • 2012 WL 2914032
  • 2012 Mo. LEXIS 118

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • declining to engage in plain error review of a jointly submitted jury instruction because the error was considered invited
  • “’Juror testimony is improper if it merely alleges that jurors acted on improper motives, beliefs, or mental operations, also known as matters inherent in the verdict.’ Matters inherent in the verdict include... ’a juror not joining in the verdict .... ’”
  • no plain error review of the complaining party’s invited errors

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Breckenridge, Byrn, Draper, Fischer, Price, Russell, Stith, Teitelman

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

71 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

6 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases named State v. Bolden

74 other CourtListener records share this case name; the 50 most cited are listed.

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.