Ohio Court of Appeals· 4/25/2022
State v. Greene
Citations
- 2022 Ohio 1357
Syllabus
The trial court did not err by denying defendant-appellant's motion to suppress his chemical-breath test. The trial court did not abuse its discretion in its evidentiary determinations. The jury's verdicts are based on sufficient evidence and are not against the manifest weight of the evidence. Judgment affirmed.
Judges: Zimmerman
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCites
39 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- State v. ThompkinsOhio Supreme Court· 1997-05-14· cited 16,183×
- State v. JenksOhio Supreme Court· 1991-07-31· cited 11,342×
- State v. DehassOhio Supreme Court· 1967-05-31· cited 7,146×
- Seasons Coal Co. v. City of ClevelandOhio Supreme Court· 1984-04-18· cited 4,990×
- State v. AdamsOhio Supreme Court· 1980-05-07· cited 3,804×
- State v. BurnsideOhio Supreme Court· 2003-10-22· cited 2,261×
- State v. FanningOhio Supreme Court· 1982-07-14· cited 2,064×
- State v. SmithOhio Supreme Court· 1997-10-15· cited 2,042×
- State v. WilsonOhio Supreme Court· 2007-05-23· cited 1,198×
- State v. HunterOhio Supreme Court· 2011-12-20· cited 787×
- State v. IssaOhio Supreme Court· 2001-08-29· cited 787×
- State v. ConwayOhio Supreme Court· 2006-06-21· cited 704×
- State v. RobertsOhio Supreme Court· 2006-08-02· cited 348×
- State v. SkatzesOhio Supreme Court· 2004-12-08· cited 294×
- State v. HallerOhio Court of Appeals· 2012-11-13· cited 264×
- State v. FrazierOhio Supreme Court· 2007-10-10· cited 242×
- State v. JonesOhio Court of Appeals· 2013-10-30· cited 214×
- City of Westerville v. CunninghamOhio Supreme Court· 1968-07-10· cited 166×
- State v. BerryOhio Court of Appeals· 2013-06-10· cited 147×
- State v. WilliamsOhio Court of Appeals· 2011-12-09· cited 136×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.