Skip to main content

State v. Blakley

Citations

  • 534 N.W.2d 645
  • 1995 WL 374775

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • indicating the relevant question is when the actual damages were incurred, regardless of when the victim was compensated by the crime victim compensation program
  • finding defendant waived argument “the State failed to present any evidence that the victim or crime assistance program was entitled to restitution,” so the State was not required to “put on its whole case regarding restitution”
  • the language of section 910.3 is the “legislature’s way of ensuring that restitution is determined promptly”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: McGiverin, Harris, Larson, Lavorato, Neuman

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

14 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

5 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.