Court of Appeals of Iowa· 10/29/1997

State v. Mai

Citations

572 N.W.2d 168
1997 Iowa App. LEXIS 102
1997 WL 786914

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

holding record of criminal history “confirms the propriety of the sentence imposed by the district court”
using evidence and verdicts from trial to review sufficiency of the evidence supporting restitution determination
finding sufficient “[t]he nature of the crime committed, age, past record, recommendations in the substance abuse evaluation, your blood- alcohol test result and the recommendations and facts included in the presentence investigation”
finding a defendant’s failure to raise an objection to the restitution ordered at the sentencing hearing did not bar that claim on appeal when the objection was raised in the defendant’s brief
State must prove “by a preponderance of the evidence a causal connection exists between the criminal act and the victim’s damages”
“Where an improper sentence is severable this court may strike invalid portions of the sentence without disturbing the remainder and remand for appropriate action in the district court.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Cady, Huitink, Vogel

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

16 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

17 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.