State v. Kluesner

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that restitution is mandatory even when the sentencing options under section 907.3 are exercised
• holding that restitution is mandatory even when the sentencing options under section 907.3 are exercised
• holding that restitution is mandatory even when the sentencing options under section 907.3 are exercised
• holding a deferred judgment was a “judgment of conviction” for the purposes of Iowa’s restitution law because that law was intended to protect the public
• holding deferred judgment is a conviction for purposes of restitution law
• qualifying phrases in stat utes usually refer only to the immediately preceding antecedent

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).