Skip to main content

Citations

  • 888 S.W.2d 776
  • 1994 Tenn. Crim. App. LEXIS 411

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • stating that the “single most important factor is whether the defendant was prejudiced by the delay, and the most important issue concerning prejudice to the defendant is the impairment of the ability to prepare a defense’
  • suggesting an evidentiary approach analysis in saying, “Criminal trespass is a lesser included offense of aggravated burglary under the facts in this case

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Walter C. Kurtz

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

40 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

16 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.