Court of Appeals of Oregon· 6/29/1994

State v. Binner

Citations

877 P.2d 642
128 Or. App. 639
1994 Ore. App. LEXIS 978

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

informant’s ability to describe a growing operation “in extreme detail also engendered] indicia of reliability”
“That some of the corroborated details concern nonincriminating facts does not adversely affect their worth for establishing the informant’s veracity.”
“That an application for a warrant contains some information that was obtained in violation of a defendant’s constitutional rights does not compel the conclusion that the search conducted pursuant to that warrant was invalid.”
“Our review is limited to determining whether, on the basis of the information contained in the application for the warrant, a neutral and detached magistrate could have concluded that there was probable cause to believe [the matter asserted].”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Consolidated, Rossman, De Muniz Leeson

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

10 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

19 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.