State v. Clark

Citations

• 2018 Ohio 4600

Syllabus

R.C. 2929.11 and 2929.12/maximum sentence R.C. 2929.14(C)(4)/consecutive sentences. The trial court's imposition of a maximum term was proper where it was not outside the statutory range and the seriousness and recidivism factors were considered. There was no error in the trial court's imposition of consecutive sentences where it was found that consecutive sentences were required to protect the public from future crime, to punish appellant, and that the consecutive sentences were not disproportionate to the seriousness of appellant's conduct or the danger appellant poses to the public.