Ohio Court of Appeals· 7/29/2025
State v. Bias
Citations
- 2025 Ohio 2653
Syllabus
The trial court did not err in denying defendant's motion for leave to file a delayed motion for new trial under Crim.R. 33(A)(6). The defendant failed to show that he was unavoidably prevented from discovering the contents of an exhibit in the record that was initially designated as \counsel only\ but was later entered into evidence at trial. Judgment affirmed.
Judges: Dingus
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCites
7 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- Brady v. MarylandSupreme Court· 1963-05-13· cited 33,902×
- State v. IaconaOhio Supreme Court· 2001-08-29· cited 220×
- State v. HattonOhio Supreme Court· 2022-11-10· cited 113×
- State v. BiasOhio Court of Appeals· 2022-12-22· cited 19×
- State v. LundyOhio Court of Appeals· 2020-04-21· cited 14×
- State v. JonesOhio Court of Appeals· 2016-08-16· cited 11×
- State v. [D.M.]Ohio Court of Appeals· 2015-10-13· cited 4×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.