Skip to main content

State v. Cunningham

Citations

  • 2025 Ohio 44

Syllabus

Remote witness testimony; Sixth Amendment confrontation clause; harmless error; having a weapon while under disability; sufficiency of the evidence; manifest weight of the evidence. Defendant's conviction for having weapons while under disability is affirmed. Two judges would reverse the conviction for being unsupported by the manifest weight of the evidence, but because one judge dissented, and there is not unanimous agreement to reverse on a manifest weight theory, the conviction must be affirmed.

Judges: E.A. Gallagher

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cites

41 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.