Skip to main content

State v. Benson

Citations

  • 313 Or. App. 748
  • 495 P.3d 717

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • explaining that a registry requirement was not punitive because it “exists as part of a noncriminal regulatory framework, is individually regulatory in nature, and serves the noncriminal purpose of effectuating Oregon’s sex offender registration system”
  • defendant’s arguments in the trial court under Article I, section 12, and the Fifth Amendment preserved for appeal his arguments under ORS 136.425(1)

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Shorr

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

3 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

30 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.