Court of Appeals of Oregon· 8/11/2021
State v. Benson
Citations
- 313 Or. App. 748
- 495 P.3d 717
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- explaining that a registry requirement was not punitive because it “exists as part of a noncriminal regulatory framework, is individually regulatory in nature, and serves the noncriminal purpose of effectuating Oregon’s sex offender registration system”
- defendant’s arguments in the trial court under Article I, section 12, and the Fifth Amendment preserved for appeal his arguments under ORS 136.425(1)
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Shorr
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
3 cases in this archive cite this case.
Cites
30 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- Schneckloth v. BustamonteSupreme Court· 1973-05-29· cited 11,783×
- Dickerson v. United StatesSupreme Court· 2000-06-26· cited 1,932×
- Marchetti v. United StatesSupreme Court· 1968-01-29· cited 1,283×
- Grosso v. United StatesSupreme Court· 1968-01-29· cited 947×
- Haynes v. United StatesSupreme Court· 1968-01-29· cited 601×
- California v. ByersSupreme Court· 1971-05-17· cited 422×
- Albertson v. Subversive Activities Control BoardSupreme Court· 1966-01-17· cited 333×
- State v. HitzOregon Supreme Court· 1988-12-20· cited 253×
- State v. WalkerOregon Supreme Court· 2011-07-28· cited 171×
- Baltimore City Department of Social Services v. BouknightSupreme Court· 1989-10-02· cited 154×
- State v. Roble-BakerOregon Supreme Court· 2006-05-25· cited 111×
- State v. SmithOregon Supreme Court· 1986-09-16· cited 64×
- State v. JonesCourt of Appeals of Oregon· 2008-11-12· cited 29×
- State v. MacNabOregon Supreme Court· 2002-08-15· cited 28×
- State v. TenbuschCourt of Appeals of Oregon· 1994-12-14· cited 19×
- Meadows v. Board of Parole & Post-Prison SupervisionCourt of Appeals of Oregon· 2002-05-29· cited 14×
- State v. GaitherCourt of Appeals of Oregon· 2004-11-10· cited 14×
- Redwine v. STARBOARD, LLCCourt of Appeals of Oregon· 2011-02-16· cited 11×
- State v. Chavez-MezaCourt of Appeals of Oregon· 2019-12-18· cited 11×
- State v. T. T.Court of Appeals of Oregon· 2021-01-06· cited 10×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.