Redwine v. STARBOARD, LLC

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• reversingjudgment of summary contempt entered after purported corporate principal invoked privilege against self-incrimination in refusing to respond to inquiries in debtor-creditor exam
• reversing contempt judgments based on contemnor’s failure to answer questions during judgment debtor examination where answers to questions would have exposed contemnor to criminal liability
• considering privilege against self-incrimination only under Fifth Amendment where parties did not develop a separate analysis under Article I, section 12
• “Accordingly, although we typically consider arguments raised under the Oregon Constitution before considering those raised under [the] federal constitution, we will focus on the privilege as it applies under the Fifth Amendment.” (Internal citations omitted.)
• “We review the trial court’s conclusion as to Cite as 301 Or App 404 (2019) 411 the applicability of a privilege in this context for errors of law.”
• the “[Fifth Amendment] privilege protects a person from being compelled to testify in any proceeding—including civil proceedings—when the answers may incriminate the person in a future criminal prosecution”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).