State v. Hearn
Citations
- 2021 Ohio 86
Syllabus
Where court imposed consecutive sentences in multiple judgment entries and applied full amount of jail-time credit in one judgment entry and zero days credit in second judgment entry, concern that error could occur should the first sentence someday be declared void raises only a potential controversy. Judgments currently and correctly reflect single reduction to aggregate sentence. Appellant fails to explain how jail-time credit was miscalculated and error is not evident from the record.
Judges: Mayle
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
8 cases in this archive cite this case.
- State v. YoungOhio Court of Appeals· 2022-09-08· cited 13×
- State v. JonesOhio Court of Appeals· 2021-11-24· cited 5×
- State v. HoustonOhio Court of Appeals· 2025-02-06· cited 1×
- State v. HanlanOhio Court of Appeals· 2022-11-23
- State v. WellsOhio Court of Appeals· 2023-05-25
- State v. ArmstrongOhio Court of Appeals· 2024-04-04
- State v. MillerOhio Court of Appeals· 2025-11-13
- State v. JacksonOhio Court of Appeals· 2026-06-04
Cites
6 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- Fortner v. ThomasOhio Supreme Court· 1970-04-08· cited 308×
- State v. FugateOhio Supreme Court· 2008-03-06· cited 209×
- State ex rel. Rankin v. Ohio Adult Parole AuthorityOhio Supreme Court· 2003-05-07· cited 113×
- State v. DobbinsOhio Court of Appeals· 2020-03-02· cited 8×
- State v. BennettOhio Court of Appeals· 2020-06-25· cited 5×
- State v. GueliOhio Court of Appeals· 2018-03-16· cited 2×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.