Skip to main content

State v. Hearn

Citations

  • 2021 Ohio 86

Syllabus

Where court imposed consecutive sentences in multiple judgment entries and applied full amount of jail-time credit in one judgment entry and zero days credit in second judgment entry, concern that error could occur should the first sentence someday be declared void raises only a potential controversy. Judgments currently and correctly reflect single reduction to aggregate sentence. Appellant fails to explain how jail-time credit was miscalculated and error is not evident from the record.

Judges: Mayle

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

8 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

6 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.