Idaho Supreme Court· 4/1/2005
State v. Korsen
Citations
- 111 P.3d 130
- 141 Idaho 445
- 2005 Ida. LEXIS 66
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- concluding that party substitution was not required when \the attorney for the deceased criminal appellant ... merely wishes to conclude the criminal proceeding\ through a motion for abatement ab initio
- referring to the doctrine of abatement ab initio as “the majority rule”
- referring to the doctrine of abatement ab initio as “the majority rule”
- appeal dismissed, conviction and any attendant order requiring payment of court costs, fees, restitution, or other sums to victim remain intact, and only provisions of judgment of conviction pertaining to custody and incarceration are abated
- criminal conviction held not abated by virtue 4 of victims’ constitutional rights provisions
- “we hold that a criminal conviction and any attendant order requiring payment of court costs and fees, restitution or other sums to the victim, or other similar charges, are not abated, but remain intact”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Jones, Schroeder, Trout, Eismann, Carey
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
16 cases in this archive cite this case.
- Surland v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland· 2006-04-11· cited 40×
- State v. DevinWashington Supreme Court· 2006-08-24· cited 40×
- State v. CarlinAlaska Supreme Court· 2011-03-25· cited 35×
- Commonwealth v. HernandezMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court· 2019-03-13· cited 21×
- State v. BennMontana Supreme Court· 2012-02-14· cited 16×
- Bevel v. Com.Supreme Court of Virginia· 2011-11-04· cited 14×
- State v. BurrellSupreme Court of Minnesota· 2013-10-02· cited 14×
- People v. DalyColorado Court of Appeals· 2011-06-09· cited 10×
- State of Arizona v. Richard J. GlasselArizona Supreme Court· 2013-11-21· cited 5×
- State v. ReedCourt of Appeals of Arizona· 2019-01-22· cited 4×
- Glaze v. StateSupreme Court of Minnesota· 2018-03-21· cited 2×
- State v. IsaakNorth Dakota Supreme Court· 2023-03-16· cited 1×
- Kurt J. Dypwick v. Idaho Department of LaborIdaho Supreme Court· 2009-05-29
- Dypwick v. Swift Transportation Co.Idaho Supreme Court· 2009-05-29
- Brass v. StateNevada Supreme Court· 2014-05-29
- State of Tennessee v. Hassan Falah Al MutoryTennessee Supreme Court· 2019-08-07
Cites
15 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- State v. SalazarNew Mexico Supreme Court· 1997-09-03· cited 228×
- People v. PetersMichigan Supreme Court· 1995-08-10· cited 52×
- United States v. ANDREW ANTHONY CHRISTOPHERThird Circuit· 2001-11-20· cited 47×
- IRON EAGLE DEVELOPMENT, LLC. v. Quality Design Systems, Inc.Idaho Supreme Court· 2003-02-27· cited 42×
- State v. MakailaHawaii Supreme Court· 1995-06-14· cited 38×
- Leavitt v. SwainIdaho Supreme Court· 1999-12-06· cited 31×
- State v. ChristensenUtah Supreme Court· 1993-12-29· cited 27×
- State v. ClementsSupreme Court of Florida· 1996-02-29· cited 26×
- Ex Parte StateSupreme Court of Alabama· 2005-01-07· cited 20×
- Perry v. StateSupreme Court of Delaware· 1990-05-25· cited 20×
- State v. HoxsieSouth Dakota Supreme Court· 1997-10-15· cited 17×
- United States v. Dwyer, R. BuddThird Circuit· 1988-08-30· cited 13×
- People v. RobinsonAppellate Court of Illinois· 1998-08-07· cited 12×
- People v. EkiniciNew York Supreme Court· 2002-03-14· cited 8×
- McCornick v. ShaughnessyIdaho Supreme Court· 1911-03-04· cited 6×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.