State v. Benjamin
Citations
- 2025 Ohio 5544
Syllabus
The trial court did not err in ordering appellant to pay restitution. Not only did the record demonstrate that the court had considered appellant's present and future ability to pay the restitution amount, but also appellant waived the issue of his ability to pay when he agreed to pay restitution as part of his plea agreement. Appellant likewise did not demonstrate that he received ineffective assistance of counsel for his counsel's failure to object to the restitution order. Judgment affirmed.
Judges: Huffman
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCites
13 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- Strickland v. WashingtonSupreme Court· 1984-06-25· cited 123,578×
- State v. BradleyOhio Supreme Court· 1989-05-10· cited 7,124×
- State v. LongOhio Supreme Court· 1978-02-15· cited 3,848×
- State v. LalainOhio Supreme Court· 2013-07-17· cited 102×
- State v. RatliffOhio Court of Appeals· 2011-05-13· cited 26×
- State v. TwittyOhio Court of Appeals· 2011-09-16· cited 14×
- State v. WilsonOhio Court of Appeals· 2015-08-07· cited 13×
- State v. HullOhio Court of Appeals· 2017-09-29· cited 13×
- State v. PhilbeckOhio Court of Appeals· 2015-08-21· cited 9×
- State v. JordanOhio Court of Appeals· 2021-02-05· cited 5×
- State v. BrownOhio Court of Appeals· 2024-05-24· cited 4×
- State v. LeachOhio Court of Appeals· 2017-11-03· cited 3×
- State v. T.O.Ohio Court of Appeals· 2025-01-03· cited 3×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.