Ohio Court of Appeals· 1/3/2025

State v. T.O.

Citations

2025 Ohio 15

Syllabus

The trial court did not abuse its discretion in ordering appellant to pay restitution after appellant agreed to pay restitution, the trial court explicitly considered his present and future ability to pay, and the record supported the trial court's decision. Judgment affirmed.

Judges: Lewis

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

3 cases in this archive cite this case.

State v. Smith
Ohio Court of Appeals· 2025-02-28· cited 2×
State v. Wallace
Ohio Court of Appeals· 2025-03-07
State v. Benjamin
Ohio Court of Appeals· 2025-12-12

Cites

6 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

State v. Morris
Ohio Supreme Court· 2012-06-05· cited 478×
State v. Wilson
Ohio Court of Appeals· 2015-08-07· cited 13×
State v. Hull
Ohio Court of Appeals· 2017-09-29· cited 13×
State v. Baker
Ohio Court of Appeals· 2016-01-29· cited 10×
State v. Philbeck
Ohio Court of Appeals· 2015-08-21· cited 9×
State v. Brown
Ohio Court of Appeals· 2024-05-24· cited 4×

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.