Court of Appeals of Washington· 6/11/2013
State v. Benitez
Citations
- 175 Wash. App. 116
- 302 P.3d 877
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- explaining that the \law of the case\ doctrine applies only to jury instructions, not to charging documents, because the instructions and the information serve different purposes
- the court applied the SRA definition of conviction to establish that a defendant’s juvenile adjudication is a prior conviction for an indecent exposure charge
- “the extent of protection offered under the Washington constitution has no bearing on the legal standard for waiving the right”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Brintnall, Hunt, Johanson, Quinn
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
4 cases in this archive cite this case.
Cites
26 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- State v. GunwallWashington Supreme Court· 1986-06-12· cited 1,052×
- State v. HickmanWashington Supreme Court· 1998-04-30· cited 278×
- State v. SmithWashington Supreme Court· 1991-08-15· cited 207×
- State v. CastroCourt of Appeals of Washington· 2007-10-30· cited 192×
- State v. LorenzWashington Supreme Court· 2004-07-01· cited 137×
- State v. EarlsWashington Supreme Court· 1991-02-14· cited 95×
- State v. StegallWashington Supreme Court· 1994-09-29· cited 93×
- State v. ThomasWashington Supreme Court· 1996-02-08· cited 90×
- State v. DoddWashington Supreme Court· 1992-10-08· cited 85×
- State v. McGaryCourt of Appeals of Washington· 1984-06-18· cited 58×
- State v. Woo Won ChoiCourt of Appeals of Washington· 1989-11-06· cited 43×
- State v. PierceCourt of Appeals of Washington· 2006-07-11· cited 37×
- State v. LaneWashington Supreme Court· 1952-07-10· cited 34×
- State v. SandersCourt of Appeals of Washington· 1992-07-13· cited 34×
- State v. PierceCourt of Appeals of Washington· 2006-09-06· cited 34×
- State v. Ramirez-DominguezCourt of Appeals of Washington· 2007-08-21· cited 32×
- State v. TandeckiWashington Supreme Court· 2005-03-31· cited 31×
- State v. ForzaWashington Supreme Court· 1966-12-29· cited 27×
- State v. MedlockCourt of Appeals of Washington· 1997-04-29· cited 22×
- State v. RivasCourt of Appeals of Washington· 2012-06-19· cited 22×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.