State v. Woo Won Choi

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that trial court need not appoint an interpreter where counsel indicated that he could communicate with defendant and that defendant could understand questions and answers
• “we find no error in the court’s relying on counsel’s representation in concluding that Choi did not need an interpreter”
• evidence that defendant, following a prior altercation, fired shot through open car window at close range that would have hit victim's head had he not ducked was sufficient to satisfy intent element of former first degree assault statute

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).